Re: RPM generation

[Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com>]

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Anders Broman <a.broman58 () gmail com> wrote:

> Den tis 10 apr. 2018 21:15Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com>
> skrev:
>
> > Update on building the RPM on centos:
> >
> > - asciidoctor pkg is called rubygem-asciidoctor.noarch
>
> I think we should add this name in Findasciidoctor.cmake
Ok.


> - ninja is called ninja-build both in pkg name (as in debian/ubuntu) and
> > in executable (differs from debian/ubuntu)
> > - the build script calls directly ninja, then the build fails. I've fixed
> > this by adding a symlink from ninja-build to ninja
>
> Did you build with ninja rather than with "Unix makefiles"?

Yes. I don't think it's a big deal, but I use ninja for my regular build,
so I took this way.


> > Except from the manual actions above, the rpm build succeeded. I can try
> > to fix some of them, but there are some issues still pending I can't figure
> > out myself:
> >
> > Is the rpm build platform expected to be one? If yes, which one? If no,
> > do we want to support all the flavors? It seems that different flavors
> > require different package names (link in asciidoctor). I can be hard to be
> > portable in this way.
> I did not find an rpm with asciidoctor for suse12.2 so I downloaded the
> gem files as descriptions from the asciidoctor site. I have not figured out
> how to make cmake find it. Not sure if it's related to rpm- package failing.

I can give it a run on openSUSE.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe