Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: tshark buffered packet dissection -- no realtime output?
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:34:34 -0800
On Jan 13, 2018, at 12:45 AM, Ralph Schmieder <ralph.schmieder () inka de> wrote:
But no, it's the same result. In fact, I used that option in curl (and also tried with stdbuf -o0). Would have been surprised if the results were different since the "-i -" does deliver the packets in / close-to real-time which seems to proof that the issue is not buffering in curl but in tshark.
Yes, it's buffering in tshark, but it's *input* buffering, not *output* buffering, so it has the same behavior as if curl were buffering *its* output in 4096-byte chunks. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- tshark buffered packet dissection -- no realtime output? Ralph Schmieder (Jan 12)
- Re: tshark buffered packet dissection -- no realtime output? Lee (Jan 12)
- Re: tshark buffered packet dissection -- no realtime output? Ralph Schmieder (Jan 13)
- Re: tshark buffered packet dissection -- no realtime output? Eldon (Jan 13)
- Re: tshark buffered packet dissection -- no realtime output? Guy Harris (Jan 13)
- Re: tshark buffered packet dissection -- no realtime output? Guy Harris (Jan 13)
- Re: tshark buffered packet dissection -- no realtime output? Ralph Schmieder (Jan 13)
- Re: tshark buffered packet dissection -- no realtime output? Lee (Jan 12)
- Re: tshark buffered packet dissection -- no realtime output? Guy Harris (Jan 13)
- Re: tshark buffered packet dissection -- no realtime output? Guy Harris (Jan 18)