Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: GDB / Fuzz test ?
From: Dario Lombardo <lomato () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:41:37 +0100
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 9:40 AM Antoine d'Otreppe <a.dotreppe () aspyct org> wrote:
2. I used the fuzz-test.sh, looks nice, but how many passes should I run to have adequate testing?
That's an interesting question. I don't recall how many passes I used in the past for fuzzing my dissectors. Moreover no default number of passes are present in the script. I guess once we've found the answer we could set it in the fuzzing script. Anyone more experienced in dissectors have an answer?
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- GDB / Fuzz test ? Antoine d'Otreppe (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Dario Lombardo (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Peter Wu (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Peter Wu (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Antoine d'Otreppe (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Peter Wu (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Dario Lombardo (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Jeff Morriss (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Dario Lombardo (Nov 12)