Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: GDB / Fuzz test ?
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:38:41 -0500
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 4:42 AM Dario Lombardo <lomato () gmail com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 9:40 AM Antoine d'Otreppe <a.dotreppe () aspyct org> wrote:2. I used the fuzz-test.sh, looks nice, but how many passes should I run to have adequate testing?That's an interesting question. I don't recall how many passes I used in the past for fuzzing my dissectors. Moreover no default number of passes are present in the script. I guess once we've found the answer we could set it in the fuzzing script. Anyone more experienced in dissectors have an answer?
There's no magic number, of course. It depends on how many on how many captures your testing and how big they are. Personally I used to run it at least for half an hour or so while I was off doing other things (like beautifying the code, committing it, etc.); for a brand new dissector I might go longer. Or I'd just leave it running while I went off and ate lunch or dinner or whatever.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- GDB / Fuzz test ? Antoine d'Otreppe (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Dario Lombardo (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Peter Wu (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Peter Wu (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Antoine d'Otreppe (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Peter Wu (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Dario Lombardo (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Jeff Morriss (Nov 12)
- Re: GDB / Fuzz test ? Dario Lombardo (Nov 12)