Wireshark mailing list archives
Why are ett[] arrays static?
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:51:48 -0400
Is it just me or is there no reason for ett[] arrays: /* Setup protocol subtree array */ static gint *ett[] = { &ett_PROTOABBREV to be static? It seems to me that making it static is just wasting space (keeping the array around forever)?
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Why are ett[] arrays static? Jeff Morriss (Oct 19)
- Re: Why are ett[] arrays static? Peter Wu (Oct 19)
- Re: Why are ett[] arrays static? Dario Lombardo (Oct 19)
- Re: Why are ett[] arrays static? Jeff Morriss (Oct 19)
- Re: Why are ett[] arrays static? Guy Harris (Oct 19)
- Re: Why are ett[] arrays static? Jeff Morriss (Oct 19)
- Re: Why are ett[] arrays static? Jakub Zawadzki (Oct 19)
- Re: Why are ett[] arrays static? Jeff Morriss (Oct 19)