Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Bug 16294, in_progress?
From: Uli Heilmeier <zeugs () heilmeier eu>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 08:04:13 +0100
Hi Jaap, I’ve set it to IN_PROGRESS as I’m working on a patch. I thought that's what the status field was for. ;-) Change will include support for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-08 and draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-15. Cheers Uli
Am 27.12.2019 um 20:29 schrieb Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>: Hi Uli, You’ve changed the bug to IN_PROGRESS, do you intend to push a change for this? I’ve got one ready, so if you can’t I can. Thanks, Jaap ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Bug 16294, in_progress? Jaap Keuter (Dec 27)
- Re: Bug 16294, in_progress? Uli Heilmeier (Dec 27)
- Re: Bug 16294, in_progress? Jaap Keuter (Dec 27)
- Re: Bug 16294, in_progress? Uli Heilmeier (Dec 27)