Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Bug 16294, in_progress?
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 08:44:11 +0100
HI, Yes, you are correct. That’s why I held off pushing a change myself. We’ll wait and see. Good luck, Jaap
On 28 Dec 2019, at 08:04, Uli Heilmeier <zeugs () heilmeier eu> wrote: Hi Jaap, I’ve set it to IN_PROGRESS as I’m working on a patch. I thought that's what the status field was for. ;-) Change will include support for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-08 and draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-15. Cheers UliAm 27.12.2019 um 20:29 schrieb Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>: Hi Uli, You’ve changed the bug to IN_PROGRESS, do you intend to push a change for this? I’ve got one ready, so if you can’t I can. Thanks, Jaap
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Bug 16294, in_progress? Jaap Keuter (Dec 27)
- Re: Bug 16294, in_progress? Uli Heilmeier (Dec 27)
- Re: Bug 16294, in_progress? Jaap Keuter (Dec 27)
- Re: Bug 16294, in_progress? Uli Heilmeier (Dec 27)