Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol?
From: Michael Richardson <mcr () sandelman ca>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:51:07 -0400
Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org> wrote: >> >>> 5) Treat rpcap as "remote procedure call for libpcap" and put it under the the-tcpdump-group team, and put pcap under the pcapng team as per the same reason as 4). >> >> Ok. > This would require the rules in the pcapng repository Makefile to be in > the libpcap Makefile.in. > Michael, would that be inconvenient to maintain? Yes, I think it would be a pain, but it could be done. I certainly would not use the complex lib/* makefile if we really wanted to do that. What about cmake side of things?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description:
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Michael Richardson (Apr 02)
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Guy Harris (Apr 01)
- Message not available
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol? Michael Richardson (Apr 02)