Re: [tcpdump-workers] New RFCs for 1) pcap file format and 2) rpcapd protocol?

[Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf () sandelman ca>]

Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org> wrote:
    > Currently, on GitHub, there's a "pcapng" team:
    > https://github.com/pcapng

    > with one repository containing the pcapng specification, and a "the-tcpdump-group" team:

    > https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group
    > with repositories for libpcap, tcpdump, and the tcpdump.org Web site.

    > It makes sense to me to keep those specifications on a site such as
    > GitHub; GitHub comes to mind first because that's where pcapng
    > currently is.

    > 1) add them as repositories to the pcapng team;

    > 1) has the slight disadvantage that the name for the team suggests it's
    > for pcapng only; it appears that teams can be renamed:

...

    > Were we to rename it, I don't know what would be a good new name.

I'm good with pcapng, because I also have no other suggestion.
I would like to restart the opsawg work on an IETF specification for this.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF () sandelman ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description:

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe