Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: asn2wrs.py no longer seems to generate the same code ...


From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 08:29:03 -0700

On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 6:00 AM João Valverde
<joao.valverde () tecnico ulisboa pt> wrote:

Hi Richard,

On 15/05/20 23:46, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:33 PM Peter Wu <peter () lekensteyn nl> wrote:
The "asn1" target rebuilds all asn1 dissectors.
Alternatively to rebuild a specific one, use a target such as "generate_dissector-pkcs1".
Sure, but there seems to be multiple issues.

1. The 'documented' command placed in the generated source does not
generate the same source:
2. make asn1 modifies the source directory, but it seems to me that it
should not do that because that breaks one of the out-of-tree
guarantees that cmake gives you.

Normally that would be true for a generated source file, but in this
case a choice was made to commit the generated ASN.1 source code to VCS
(for efficiency reasons I presume). Therefore the asn1 target is a
special one designed only to update the ASN.1 source tree and commit the
result.

Shouldn't the developer make that decision?

-- 
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: