Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Assigned reviewers
From: Dario Lombardo <lomato () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 18:27:30 +0100
Do you mean assignee? I guess so, but I'd like to clear it, since the reviewer and assignee were separate in Gerrit.No I really meant reviewer as I was considering the assignee as the person that will ultimately schedule the merge. You can have more than one reviewer. But I'm open to any workflow we might define. Oh, I missed it. I always forget that gitlab.com runs gitlab EE, while I
am more used to gitlab CE, which sometimes has less features. It was introduced in 13.5, enabled by default in 13.7: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/getting_started#reviewer Good to know, I'll use it to ask for reviews, thanks.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Assigned reviewers Jonathan Nieder (Jan 05)
- Re: Assigned reviewers Pascal Quantin (Jan 06)
- Re: Assigned reviewers Dario Lombardo (Jan 06)
- Re: Assigned reviewers Pascal Quantin (Jan 06)
- Re: Assigned reviewers Dario Lombardo (Jan 06)
- Re: Assigned reviewers Dario Lombardo (Jan 06)
- Re: Assigned reviewers Pascal Quantin (Jan 06)