Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: VPN overkill?


From: "Jim McBurnett" <jim () tgasolutions com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:20:47 -0500

Ted,
NO.. It is not overkill...
It depends on which VPN concentrators you are talking about..

IE a 3002 at the remote site.. $995 list-- Pix 506 $1295 list..
So I would say no...

Later,
Jim 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ted A [mailto:arcturous () hotmail com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 5:17 PM
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: VPN overkill?

All,
First off, good fun reading this list. Some really great 
advice and good thinkers on here. Thanks for the great 
questions and great answers.

So here's my issue. I have an IT infrastructure manager who 
has raised a requirement I find myself questioning.
We have a goal of connecting a remote office to a central 
office via a VPN. 
This manager insists that only acceptable way to accomplish 
this is by connecting 2 VPN concentrators. I debate this, 
noting that a PIX should be more than capable of handling 
this connection at the remote office and the only place the 
concentrator is needed is at the central office.
Am I completely off my rocker, thinking that a second 
concentrator for a single connection is a little overboard?

Thoughts?
Thanks,
Ted





Current thread: