Security Basics mailing list archives
Re:Betr.: RE: encryption
From: "Philip Wagenaar" <p.wagenaar () accon nl>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:18:47 +0100
If a hacker modifies code in the webapplication it still would go unnoticed. So would there be away to sign the code/html from a webappplication so that I know for sure I am getting what I am supposed to get in my browser? Met vriendelijke groet, (Philip) Wagenaar Assistent ICT Projecten & Advies AccoN Accountants & Adviseurs ICT Projecten & Advies Postbus 5090 6802 EB Arnhem The Netherlands tel. +31 (0)26-3842384 fax. +31 (0)26-3630222 mobile: +31 (0)6-25388935 MSN/E-mail: p.wagenaar () accon nl http://www.accon.nl
"Ghaith Nasrawi" <libero () aucegypt edu> 27-01-05 10:04 >>>
why not using SSL (with self-signed/CA signed certificates) with a logon page? I think it's more scalable and client-independent. ---------- Initial Header -----------
From : "Philip Wagenaar" p.wagenaar () accon nl
To : security-basics () securityfocus com Cc : Date : Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:24:20 +0100 Subject : Betr.: RE: encryption
I was also looking at gnupg. There are alot of tools for it. Also signing HTML files. I was
wondering if signing HTML files is useful. And if it is, anyone have any experience with it?
Also, is it possible to encrypt HTML files and make them avalible
for a specified number of users. I would have a webpage on my webserver. I would encrypt it gnupg/pgp.. and I would encrypt it for a number of users?
Met vriendelijke groet, (Philip) Wagenaar Assistent ICT Projecten & Advies AccoN Accountants & Adviseurs ICT Projecten & Advies Postbus 5090 6802 EB Arnhem The Netherlands tel. +31 (0)26-3842384 fax. +31 (0)26-3630222 mobile: +31 (0)6-25388935 MSN/E-mail: p.wagenaar () accon nl http://www.accon.nl"Robert Hines" <b.hines () comcast net> 25-01-05 00:22 >>>Alas, that would be because you have to pay for it now. In the
olden day,
All the PGP features were free, but now the basic signing is free,
the value
added protection is not. Bob "Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." - Aristotle
384-322 BC
-----Original Message----- From: Philip Wagenaar [mailto:pb.wagenaar () chello nl] Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 5:35 PM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: encryption Hi, Up to a few years ago PGP and encryption was an hot item. But it
seems it
has stand still for a few years now. Google and PGP show up only pgp programs that are more then years old. How is encryption these days? What has come by since PGP? Philip Wagenaar http://www.wagenaar.123.nl ---------------------------------------- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 3447 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now! ################################################################## Dit e-mailbericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. De informatie hierin is vertrouwelijk, zodat het derden niet is toegestaan om daarvan kennis te nemen of dit te verstrekken aan andere derden. Indien u dit e-mail bericht ontvangt terwijl het niet voor u bestemd is, verzoeken wij u contact op te nemen met de afzender en de informatie te verwijderen van iedere computer. Bij voorbaat dank. ================================================================== The information transmitted in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and contains confidential information. Any review, retransmission or other use by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Thank you. ##################################################################
#####################################################################################
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and
cleared
by MailMarshal
#####################################################################################
----- (o_ //\ Ghaith Nasrawi V_/_ PAST, n. That part of Eternity with some small fraction of which we have a slight and regrettable acquaintance. A moving line called the Present parts it from an imaginary period known as the Future. These two grand divisions of Eternity, of which the one is continually effacing the other, are entirely unlike. The one is dark with sorrow and disappointment, the other bright with prosperity and joy. The Past is the region of sobs, the Future is the realm of song. In the one crouches Memory, clad in sackcloth and ashes, mumbling penitential prayer; in the sunshine of the other Hope flies with a free wing, beckoning to temples of success and bowers of ease. Yet the Past is the Future of yesterday, the Future is the Past of to-morrow. They are one -- the knowledge and the dream. (The Devil's Dictionary) ################################################################## Dit e-mailbericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. De informatie hierin is vertrouwelijk, zodat het derden niet is toegestaan om daarvan kennis te nemen of dit te verstrekken aan andere derden. Indien u dit e-mail bericht ontvangt terwijl het niet voor u bestemd is, verzoeken wij u contact op te nemen met de afzender en de informatie te verwijderen van iedere computer. Bij voorbaat dank. ================================================================== The information transmitted in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and contains confidential information. Any review, retransmission or other use by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Thank you. ################################################################## ##################################################################################### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by MailMarshal #####################################################################################
Current thread:
- Betr.: RE: encryption Philip Wagenaar (Jan 26)
- Re: encryption Joachim Schipper (Jan 27)
- Re: Betr.: RE: encryption Kevin Carlson (Jan 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re:Betr.: RE: encryption Ghaith Nasrawi (Jan 27)
- Re:Betr.: RE: encryption Philip Wagenaar (Jan 28)
- Betr.: Re: encryption Philip Wagenaar (Jan 28)
- Re: Betr.: Re: encryption Philip Wagenaar (Jan 31)