Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Remote desktop access policy
From: "Kurt Buff" <kurt.buff () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:18:04 -0800
On Jan 18, 2008 8:12 AM, The Security Community <thesecuritycommunity () gmail com> wrote:
A PC in S3 ("standby") can Wake-On-LAN for an RDP connection. Agreed, that's not exactly being "turned off" but it's a lower power state than being turned on. Giving any user VPN access is a crapshoot. If they could be given VPN access _RESTRICTED_ to an RDP session to their desktop (or a Terminal Server dedicated to VPN access), I think that would be ideal.
As noted in my first post, SSL-Explorer can do both of these things. Kurt
Current thread:
- Analyzing Suspicious Attachment Al Cooper (Jan 17)
- Re: Analyzing Suspicious Attachment Albert R. Campa (Jan 17)
- RE: Analyzing Suspicious Attachment Brett Kennedy (Jan 17)
- Remote desktop access policy WALI (Jan 18)
- RE: Remote desktop access policy Petter Bruland (Jan 18)
- AW: Remote desktop access policy Johannes Lemmerer (Jan 18)
- Re: Remote desktop access policy Josh Haft (Jan 18)
- Re: Remote desktop access policy The Security Community (Jan 18)
- Re: Remote desktop access policy Kurt Buff (Jan 19)
- Re: Remote desktop access policy WALI (Jan 21)
- Re: Remote desktop access policy Kurt Buff (Jan 21)
- RE: Analyzing Suspicious Attachment Brett Kennedy (Jan 17)
- Re: Analyzing Suspicious Attachment Albert R. Campa (Jan 17)
- Re: Remote desktop access policy Gleb Paharenko (Jan 18)
- Re: Remote desktop access policy Kurt Buff (Jan 19)
- Re: Analyzing Suspicious Attachment brian . bevers (Jan 17)
- RE: Analyzing Suspicious Attachment Richard Golodner (Jan 18)