Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking
From: "Razi Shaban" <razishaban () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:41:16 +0400
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Matt Flynn <mflynn () netvision com> wrote:
This only works if the Phishing site is passing through the content of the original site (like some Man-In-The-Middle attacks).
True, but the majority of phishers simply copy the HTML code whole from the original site, with very few modifications. I've seen phishers who even leave comments in HTML code. Even those who modify the HTML usually do not modify the .js files, if you put the obfuscation in another .js that is used to run something or another, I highly doubt any phishers will notice. -- Razi Shaban
Current thread:
- Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Alcides (Sep 26)
- RE: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Matt Flynn (Sep 26)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Razi Shaban (Sep 26)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Ron (Sep 26)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Umil (Sep 26)
- RE: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Matt Flynn (Sep 26)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Razi Shaban (Sep 26)
- RE: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Matt Flynn (Sep 26)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Razi Shaban (Sep 29)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Ansgar Wiechers (Sep 29)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Razi Shaban (Sep 30)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Ansgar Wiechers (Sep 30)
- Re: Anti-Phishing with digital watermarking Ryan Greenier (Sep 30)