Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: UnixWare
From: spaf () cs purdue edu (Gene Spafford)
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 94 11:00:07 -0500
I've had several people tell me that HP has gotten better recently. I would have mentioned them as good examples, except: 1) I have not seen them make any security patch announcements to any of the established security-related newsgroups or mailing lists. 2) HP does not have a member or liason in FIRST, nor have they had any presence at any of the incident response workshops. 3) I have read accounts of HP customers not being able to get security patches because they aren't paying for maintenance. #3 may no longer be true; in any event, I have no direct experience with it so I can't say it was ever more than a misunderstanding. --spaf
Current thread:
- Re: UnixWare Carl Corey (Apr 26)
- Re: UnixWare Perry E. Metzger (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare Michael Neuman (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare Gene Spafford (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare a.e.mossberg (Apr 28)
- Re: UnixWare Gene Spafford (Apr 28)
- Re: UnixWare David A. Curry (Apr 28)
- HP's security stance (was Re: UnixWare) Bennett Todd (Apr 28)
- Re: HP's security stance (was Re: UnixWare) Gene Spafford (Apr 28)
- Re: UnixWare Christopher Klaus (Apr 28)
- Re: UnixWare Gene Spafford (Apr 28)
- Re: UnixWare Michael Neuman (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare Perry E. Metzger (Apr 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UnixWare Carl Corey (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare der Mouse (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare Casper Dik (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare Perry E. Metzger (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare Bonfield James (Apr 28)
- Re: UnixWare Perry E. Metzger (Apr 27)