Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: UnixWare
From: davy () ecn purdue edu (David A. Curry)
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 1994 12:17:34 EST
From: Gene Spafford <spaf () cs purdue edu> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 94 11:00:07 -0500 Subject: Re: UnixWare I've had several people tell me that HP has gotten better recently. I would have mentioned them as good examples, except: 1) I have not seen them make any security patch announcements to any of the established security-related newsgroups or mailing lists. They have, but they seem to vary. Sometimes it's in comp.security.unix, other times it's in comp.sys.hp.whatever. This needs to be standardized. At some point in the past, someone at HP established a mailing list (much like Sun's Customer Warning System) to receive all those announcements. I got added to the list right away; I have *never* received anything from it. 2) HP does not have a member or liason in FIRST, nor have they had any presence at any of the incident response workshops. Nor do they distribute their announcements to CERT/CIAC/FIRST/etc. redistribution through those mailing lists. I think HP *is* getting better. But they've got a ways to go. --Dave
Current thread:
- Re: UnixWare Carl Corey (Apr 26)
- Re: UnixWare Perry E. Metzger (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare Michael Neuman (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare Gene Spafford (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare a.e.mossberg (Apr 28)
- Re: UnixWare Gene Spafford (Apr 28)
- Re: UnixWare David A. Curry (Apr 28)
- HP's security stance (was Re: UnixWare) Bennett Todd (Apr 28)
- Re: HP's security stance (was Re: UnixWare) Gene Spafford (Apr 28)
- Re: UnixWare Christopher Klaus (Apr 28)
- Re: UnixWare Gene Spafford (Apr 28)
- Re: UnixWare Michael Neuman (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare Perry E. Metzger (Apr 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UnixWare Carl Corey (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare der Mouse (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare Casper Dik (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare Perry E. Metzger (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare Bonfield James (Apr 28)
- Re: UnixWare Perry E. Metzger (Apr 27)
- Re: UnixWare Michael Neuman (Apr 27)