Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994
From: RAS () CACDVAX CACD ROCKWELL COM (RAS () CACDVAX CACD ROCKWELL COM)
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 1994 16:51:38 -0600 (CST)
Stating the obvious here, but we seem to be in the experiment now.Hmm, not exactly. Experiments require controls and statistical bases, not recollection of previous events. [...] I'm open to anything that shows that full disclosure helps more than partial or no disclosure. My personal hunch is that it doesn't, but I won't claim that as fact. I'm simply trying to point out that we all need to understand this difference between opinion and fact.
Are there any well substantiated facts which show that full disclosure harms the situation? If there aren't any facts to prove or disprove the effects of full disclosure, then isn't the decision to not provide full disclosure based upon opinion? Bob Schneider Rockwell International Comments expressed are strictly my own and are not to be construed as statements endorsed by my employer.
Current thread:
- Old vulnerability disclosure please? (fwd), (continued)
- Old vulnerability disclosure please? (fwd) Jeon Young-mi (Nov 29)
- Re: (fwd) In reply to comments about new policy (fwd) Pug (Nov 30)
- Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994 Robert M. Haas (Nov 29)
- Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994 Casper Dik (Nov 29)
- Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994 Doug Siebert (Nov 29)
- STOP! Aleph One (Nov 29)
- Re: Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994 Pete Hartman (Nov 28)
- Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994 Gene Spafford (Nov 29)
- Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994 Pat Myrto (Nov 29)
- Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994 Karl Strickland (Nov 30)
- Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994 Pat Myrto (Nov 29)
- Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994 RAS () CACDVAX CACD ROCKWELL COM (Nov 29)
- Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994 Gene Spafford (Nov 30)