Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Re[2]: sniffers
From: dan () pasteur fr (Daniel Azuelos)
Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 10:06:48 +0200 (MET DST)
Nayfield, Rod wrote: | Right. There is no way. one of smb's papers (and the book) mention using a | sniffer with transmit leads cut. | | The best protection would be to use switches instead of hubs... even a | multi-port bridge for thinnet is a good idea when you use it to seperate | workgroups. | | rod Right, no way to detect a sniffer with no transmit lead. But many funny way to kill it. All you need is 2 machines faster than the potential sniffer. -- dan «If looks could kill, they probably will, ....»
Current thread:
- Re: sniffers Patrick Horgan (Apr 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: sniffers Patrick Horgan (Apr 30)
- Re: sniffers Colin Jenkins (May 02)
- Re: sniffers Colin Jenkins (May 01)
- Re: sniffers Mr Martin J Hargreaves (May 01)
- Re: sniffers Cyrus Lesser (May 01)
- Re: sniffers mulligan () future incog com (May 01)
- Re: sniffers Oliver Friedrichs (May 01)
- Re: sniffers Jas (May 02)
- Re: sniffers mulligan () future incog com (May 02)
- Re: sniffers Oliver Friedrichs (May 01)
- Re: Re[2]: sniffers Daniel Azuelos (May 02)
- Re: Re[2]: sniffers Dr. Frederick B. Cohen (May 04)
- Re: sniffers der Mouse (May 02)
- Re: sniffers Dios (May 02)