Bugtraq mailing list archives
SigSev -> Security Hole
From: mouse () finance econ su oz au (Tim Smithers)
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 11:22:29 +1000
In regards to the overrunning of arrays, is the sigsev, core dumped a true indication of an exploitable security hole? I think quite a few suid binaries exhibit this behaviour but how many are exploitable? -mouse -- Tim Smithers. DMouse Pty. Ltd. ph: 019 910 195 e-mail: mouse () finance econ su oz au ( Perfection is a hobby many pursue, but few have a chance of success )
Current thread:
- Re: libresolv+ bug, (continued)
- Re: libresolv+ bug der Mouse (Aug 19)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Alan Cox (Aug 20)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Thomas Ptacek (Aug 20)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Julian Assange (Aug 21)
- Re: libresolv+ bug John Nemeth (Aug 20)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Andi Gutmans (Aug 20)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Jon Lewis (Aug 20)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Elliot Lee (Aug 20)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Nick Andrew (Aug 20)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Jon Lewis (Aug 20)
- SigSev -> Security Hole Tim Smithers (Aug 20)
- Re: SigSev -> Security Hole Brian Mitchell (Aug 20)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Jon Lewis (Aug 20)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Don Lewis (Aug 20)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Zygo Blaxell (Aug 21)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Zygo Blaxell (Aug 21)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Julian Assange (Aug 21)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Thomas Ptacek (Aug 21)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Nick Andrew (Aug 22)
- Re: libresolv+ bug John Macdonald (Aug 22)
- Re: libresolv+ bug David Holland (Aug 22)
- Re: libresolv+ bug Zygo Blaxell (Aug 22)
- Re: libresolv+ bug der Mouse (Aug 19)