Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail
From: junya () fsdirect com (Junya Ho)
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 1996 15:28:22 -0400
Why not have an file /etc/rights or something, which contains the rights for users on the system (with a standard format, whatever it may be), and have a simple API which any package maintainer (of sendmail, wu-ftpd, etc) could use to look up permissions within that file. The API would also have to have calls to maintain (add, change, delete) rights and users, which would be used by the sysadmin. One of the issues of extending an already existing file (/etc/passwd say) is that it would take a long time to have it supported by everyone (at least on the commercial side), which would preclude timely adoption and cross-platform portability. Of course, it'd only be worthwhile if enough packages required the knowing of specific rights - pipes in .forward, .rhosts files, ftp access, shell access, ability to change shell & gecos info, ability to su &c. junya ho
Current thread:
- /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) der Mouse (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail Jauder Ho (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail BriaNeiLevine (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail Douglas Song (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail Junya Ho (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail Shaun Lowry (Aug 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Rob Payne (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Eugene Bradley (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Todd Vierling (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Julian Assange (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Theo de Raadt (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Sam Quigley (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) W Lee Nussbaum (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail) Douglas Song (Aug 08)
- Re: /etc/shells (was Re: procmail Jauder Ho (Aug 08)