Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: OOB Bug stills persists after hot fix
From: dan () UNT EDU (Dan Freise)
Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 10:11:52 -0500
Matthew Dovey wrote:
http://pobox.leidenuniv.nl/%7Eewit/winnuke/, the Mac binary also listed on that page appears to still be capable of downing an NT 4.0
It does.
Does anyone know what is peculiar about the Mac implementation of the
Oddly enough, there is nothing peculiar about the mac implementation. Upon compiling the mac source on two separate UNIX machines, the resulting binary fails to crash an NT box. The obvious conclusion is that Apple's Open Transport somehow sends a different packet than most other TCP/IP implementations. If I get the time to dig the packets apart, I'll post the results here as well. -- Dan Freise ____ http://autobahn.cascss.unt.edu/~dan A&S Computing Services \ / (817) 565-4498 \/ dan () unt edu
Current thread:
- OOB Bug stills persists after hot fix Matthew Dovey (May 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OOB Bug stills persists after hot fix Dan Freise (May 19)
- Re: OOB Bug stills persists after hot fix Ervin Fried (May 20)
- Re: OOB Bug stills persists after hot fix Ervin Fried (May 20)
- Re: OOB Bug stills persists after hot fix Ervin Fried (May 20)
- Re: OOB Bug stills persists after hot fix Ervin Fried (May 22)
- New M$ TCP/IP bug found.... got the NT Blue's yet? Kelly E. Gibbs (May 22)
- PMDF sendmail vulnerability Jonathan Rozes (May 23)
- Update to Windows 95 TCP/IP to Address Out-of-Band Issue Aleph One (May 23)
- [WinNT] Post-SP3 Hotfix Avail for Macintosh OOB DOS Attack Sam Schlansky (May 23)
- cfingerd vulnerability Rodrigo Barbosa (May 23)
- Re: cfingerd vulnerability Edward S. Marshall (May 24)
- Re: cfingerd vulnerability Ken Hollis (May 24)