Re: OOB Bug stills persists after hot fix

[ervin () NAME NET (Ervin Fried)]

At 01:41 PM 5/21/97 -0700, Ian Eure wrote:
> Does this affect systems with sp3? Does the hotfix do anything at all to a
> system that already has sp3?

just installed SP3

same effect:
crash with
STOP: 0x000000A ( ... )
IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL address ... has base at ... - tcpip.sys

> On Tue, 20 May 1997, Ervin Fried wrote:
>
> > We applied the OOB hotfix to 2 NT Server 4.0, SP2 machines
> >
> > Then we tested it with the Perl version of nuke (nuke.pl), on a Win95
machine.
> > Result: blue screen, reboot needed.
> >
> > Are there any success stories about OOB hotfix?
> >
> > Maybe is something particular to our servers ...
> >
> >
> > Ervin Fried
> >
> > At 10:11 AM 5/19/97 -0500, Dan Freise wrote:
> > > Matthew Dovey wrote:
> > >
> > > > http://pobox.leidenuniv.nl/%7Eewit/winnuke/, the Mac binary also listed
> > > > on that page appears to still be capable of downing an NT 4.0
> > >
> > >        It does.
> > > > Does anyone know what is peculiar about the Mac implementation of the
> > >
> > >        Oddly enough, there is nothing peculiar about the mac
implementation.
> > > Upon compiling the mac source on two separate UNIX machines, the
> > > resulting binary fails to crash an NT box.
> > >
> > >        The obvious conclusion is that Apple's Open Transport somehow
sends a
> > > different packet than most other TCP/IP implementations.
> > >
> > >        If I get the time to dig the packets apart, I'll post the results
> > here
> > > as well.
> > > --
> > > Dan Freise                 ____  http://autobahn.cascss.unt.edu/~dan
> > > A&S Computing Services     \  /
> > > (817) 565-4498              \/   dan () unt edu


Ervin