Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Linux GNOME exploit
From: security () SLACKWARE COM (Slackware Security Team)
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 17:52:59 -0700
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Ron DuFresne wrote:
Also, since slackware as well <slackware 4.0> documents: - Large repository of contributed software compiled and ready to run. This includes GNOME 1.0.
It doesn't include any setuid programs linked with the GNOME libraries (not a good idea), and isn't vulnerable to this problem. Try looking next time.
The GNOME troubles were cross posted to slackware-security () slackware com, though, this looks to be a dead list since nothing has rooled backout of it for two days....
You must have prior approval to post on slackware-security. Security reports should be mailed to this address, or reports should be mailed to this address, or support () slackware com. If they're legit, we'll pass them along to the list. Take care, Pat --- Patrick J. Volkerding volkerdi () slackware com
Current thread:
- Linux GNOME exploit Brock Tellier (Sep 23)
- Re: Linux GNOME exploit Alan Cox (Sep 27)
- Re: Linux GNOME exploit Brock Tellier (Sep 27)
- Re: Linux GNOME exploit Matt Wilson (Sep 27)
- Re: Linux GNOME exploit Ron DuFresne (Sep 29)
- Re: Linux GNOME exploit Slackware Security Team (Sep 29)
- Multiple Vendor ARCAD permission problems Brock Tellier (Sep 29)
- Re: Linux GNOME exploit Chmouel Boudjnah (Sep 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Linux GNOME exploit Elliot Lee (Sep 27)
- Re: Linux GNOME exploit Adam Sampson (Sep 28)
- Re: Linux GNOME exploit Thomas Biege (Sep 28)