Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Opinions wanted...
From: "Kurt Buff" <kurt.buff () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:40:51 -0800
All, I've been working with Watchguards at my current employer for quite a while, but we're looking to replace them. We've received a recommendation from one firm for Sidewinders (a 410 and a couple of 110s for the branch offices). We've received a recommendation against the Sidewinders from another firm saying that they are too complex to manage easily, and require extensive training to understand - they recommend Checkpoint instead. Neither seems to be completely out of our price range, so it would seem to come down to concerns regarding initial implementation and ongoing management. Are the Sidewinders that much more complex than Checkpoints? Is one "better" (for whatever that might mean to you) than the other - that is, if you have experience with both, which would you prefer, and why? I, of course, am excited to be learning a new platform, and want to move away from some of the quirkiness of the ancient Fireboxes we have, but want to make a reasonable recommendation to management. Thanks, Kurt _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Opinions wanted... Kurt Buff (Nov 23)
- Re: Opinions wanted... Timothy Shea (Nov 23)
- Re: Opinions wanted... Dave Piscitello (Nov 23)
- Re: Opinions wanted... Kurt Buff (Nov 25)
- Re: Opinions wanted... Kurt Buff (Nov 25)
- Re: Opinions wanted... dlang (Nov 25)
- Re: Opinions wanted... Dave Piscitello (Nov 23)
- Re: Opinions wanted... ArkanoiD (Nov 25)
- Re: Opinions wanted... Kurt Buff (Nov 25)
- Re: Opinions wanted... Chris Blask (Nov 25)
- Re: Opinions wanted... Cat Okita (Nov 25)
- Re: Opinions wanted... Kurt Buff (Nov 25)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Opinions wanted... Timothy Shea (Nov 23)