Re: Funny article

[martin f krafft <madduck () madduck net>]

AS: Please don't CC me to list mail. I explicitly set
Mail-Followup-To to request this...

also sprach dphull () ku edu <dphull () ku edu> [2003.11.12.2133 +0100]:
> I don't consider the web/mail/ftp servers, windows managers, browsers, mail 
> clients etc. to be part of the operating system, per se.
>
> Certainly a vulnerability in Apache should not be a strike against Linux, 
> should it?

I would definitely not doubt that Microsoft does though. After all,
it's part of Windows, so they'll have to see it as part of Linux if
they want to have well-selling figures.

What is fact and what Microsoft will call fact are two exactly
orthogonal things, most of the time.

> I like how the article quoted Steve Ballmer comparing Windows 2000
> Server and W2K3 Server with Red Hat 6. Why doesn't Ballmer compare
> the state of the art Windows OS' available at the time RH6 came
> out? Did Windows NT 4 not stack up as well against RH6 as W2K/3?

Good point! Red Hat 6 was like, what, 2000 or 1999?

-- 
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
 
invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
"no work of art ever puts forward views.
 views belong to people
 who are not artists."
                                                        -- oscar wilde

Attachment: _bin
Description: