funsec mailing list archives
Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible?
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 04:03:11 +0200
Blue Boar wrote:
Gadi Evron wrote:While I certainly did not dispute the facts that David Litchfield showed of Oracle's behaviour, I did not agree with how he did it or that Oracle is alone.I didn't see that mentioned. What did Dave do wrong?
Yo BB!He didn't do anything wrong.. I didn't agree with his way. That does not mean it was wrong.
Gadi. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Gadi Evron (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Blue Boar (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Gadi Evron (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Blue Boar (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Gadi Evron (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Blue Boar (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Gadi Evron (Dec 10)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Blue Boar (Dec 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Gadi Evron (Dec 12)
- oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Gadi Evron (Dec 12)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? RLVaughn (Dec 12)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Blue Boar (Dec 12)
- RE: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Aditya Deshmukh (Dec 12)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? Blue Boar (Dec 13)
- Re: oracle not only offeder - researchers NOT responsible? RLVaughn (Dec 12)