funsec mailing list archives
RE: Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail
From: "Larry Seltzer" <larry () larryseltzer com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:03:35 -0500
You know what? Our single biggest problem is people who go to the effort of subscribing to a mailing list (and we're talking confirmed opt-in here), and then they plonk the 'spam' button when they get mail from the list.
I hear this all the time. In the very long term I figure RSS should replace mailing lists because the opting is all client-side. In the meantime it's actually another thing that Goodmail can help with. They're working on an unsubscribe intermediary service, where when someone hits the Spam button for a supported list it gets translated into an unsubscribe request. Of course they need decide at that point who to undubscribe from what. Maybe this is something that AOL could help with too. It seems to me that they have enough infrastructure in place that I, from a confirmable address like aol-postmaster () mydomain com, should be able to ask for notifications that a user has pressed the spam button on mail sent from mydomain.com. I guess there's potential for abuse here, so AOL can't have too much patience with the mydomain.com administrator. Am I off-base? Larry Seltzer eWEEK.com Security Center Editor http://security.eweek.com/ http://blog.ziffdavis.com/seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larryseltzer () ziffdavis com _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail, (continued)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 08)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail der Mouse (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- RE: Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- RE: Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- Re: Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 09)
- RE: Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- Re[6]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 09)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Jeff Kell (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Richard M. Smith (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Gary Funck (Feb 09)
- RE: Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Richard M. Smith (Feb 09)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry/Spamhaus (Feb 09)