funsec mailing list archives
RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail
From: "Richard M. Smith" <rms () computerbytesman com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 07:29:18 -0500
By defailt, the AOL 9.0 email reader blocks images including Web bugs in HTML email messages. Richard -----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Larry Seltzer Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 6:07 AM To: 'Jeff Kell' Cc: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: RE: [funsec] Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail
Can the user "opt out" of this "special treatment"? Or are they forced to view [by AOLs mail client] whatever the paid sender desires?
I don't know if you can opt out of receiving any such mail, but Goodmail's rules (http://www.goodmailsystems.com/aup.pdf) prohibit unsolicited mail and require that senders include unsubscribe requests and honor them.
Maybe we're focusing on the wrong end of the issue. Beacons, web bugs, and other tracking spyware are guaranteed to work in AOLs client? regardless?
I don't know that AOL's client supports them at all. It probably does since it supports HTML e-mail. I would think the only way to block web bugs completely would be to make your mail text-only; if that's what you want why would you be using AOL? Larry Seltzer eWEEK.com Security Center Editor http://security.eweek.com/ http://blog.ziffdavis.com/seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larryseltzer () ziffdavis com _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail, (continued)
- Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- RE: Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- RE: Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- Re: Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 09)
- RE: Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- Re[6]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 09)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Jeff Kell (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Richard M. Smith (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 09)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 09)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Gary Funck (Feb 09)
- RE: Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Richard M. Smith (Feb 09)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry/Spamhaus (Feb 09)
- Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 08)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Tom Van Vleck (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)