funsec mailing list archives
RE: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?"
From: "Gary Funck" <gary () intrepid com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:57:25 -0800
"The creeping extension of implantation technology will eventually break down all the barriers between us and the state ..." http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,,1714256,00.html George Monbiot Tuesday February 21, 2006 The Guardian It received just a few column inches in a couple of papers, but the story I read last week looks to me like a glimpse of the future. A company in Ohio called City-Watcher has implanted radio transmitters into the arms of two of its workers. The implants ensure that only they can enter the strongroom. Apparently it is "the first known case in which US workers have been tagged electronically as a way of identifying them". The transmitters are tiny (about the size of a grain of rice), cheap (£85 and falling fast), safe and stable. Without being maintained or replaced, they can identify someone for many years. They are injected, with a local anaesthetic, into the upper arm. They require no power source, as they become active only when scanned. There are no technical barriers to their wider deployment. The company that makes these "radio frequency identification tags", the VeriChip Corporation, says they "combine access control with the location and protection of individuals". The chips can also be implanted in hospital patients, especially children and people who are mentally ill. When doctors want to know who they are and what their medical history is, they simply scan them in. This, apparently, is "an empowering option to affected individuals". For a while, a school in California toyed with the idea of implanting the chips in all its pupils. A tag such as this has a maximum range of a few metres. But another implantable device emits a signal that allows someone to be found or tracked by satellite. The patent notice says it can be used to locate the victims of kidnapping or people lost in the wilderness. There are, in other words, plenty of legitimate uses for implanted chips. This is why they bother me. A technology whose widespread deployment, if attempted now, would be greeted with horror, will gradually become unremarkable. As this happens, its purpose will begin to creep. At first the tags will be more widely used for workers with special security clearance. No one will be forced to wear one; no one will object. Then hospitals - and a few in the US are already doing this - will start scanning their unconscious or incoherent patients to see whether they have a tag. Insurance companies might start to demand that vulnerable people are chipped. The armed forces will discover that they are more useful than dog tags for identifying injured soldiers or for tracking troops who are lost or have been captured by the enemy. Prisons will soon come to the same conclusion. Then sweatshops in developing countries will begin to catch on. Already the overseers seek to control their workers to the second; determining when they clock on, when they visit the toilet, even the number of hand movements they perform. A chip makes all this easier. The workers will not be forced to have them, any more than they are forced to have sex with their bosses; but if they don't accept the conditions, they don't get the job. After that, it surely won't be long before asylum seekers are confronted with a similar choice: you don't have to accept an implant, but if you refuse, you can't stay in the country. [...] There will be no dramatic developments. We will not step out of our homes one morning to discover that the state, or our boss, or our insurance company, knows everything about us. But, if the muted response to the ID card is anything to go by, we will gradually submit, in the name of our own protection, to the demands of the machine. And it will not then require a tyrannical new government to deprive us of our freedom. Step by voluntary step, we will have given it up already. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public, (continued)
- Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public Dude VanWinkle (Feb 21)
- RE: Things you can't take pictures of in public Bruce Ediger (Feb 21)
- Re: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" Blue Boar (Feb 20)
- RE: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" Larry Seltzer (Feb 20)
- Re: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" Blue Boar (Feb 20)
- When surveillance cameras lie Richard M. Smith (Feb 20)
- Re: When surveillance cameras lie Dude VanWinkle (Feb 20)
- Re: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" Larry/Spamhaus (Feb 20)
- RE: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why shouldyou worry about it?" Larry Seltzer (Feb 20)
- Re: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" David Lodge (Feb 21)
- RE: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" Gary Funck (Feb 21)
- Re: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" coderman (Feb 21)
- RE: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" James Kehl (Feb 22)
- "arms" dealer! Gadi Evron (Feb 22)
- Re: "arms" dealer! Julio Canto (Feb 22)
- Re: "arms" dealer! Dude VanWinkle (Feb 22)