funsec mailing list archives
Re: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?"
From: Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:18:36 -0800
Larry Seltzer wrote:
http://www.infowars.com/articles/bb/cctv_security_offices_used_cams_naked_women.htm Straw man again. Obviously these cameras were trained on a private place. Any reasonable camera policy would prohibit this, and it's still a distraction from the real issue which is surveillance of *public* places
What do you mean? It was a public camera that the operators abused and pointed into a private residence. I've read several variations on this story, where the police use the camera in a public place to check out women instead of using them for the intended purpose. How is that not precisely on-topic?
BB _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: Things you can't take pictures of in public, (continued)
- RE: Things you can't take pictures of in public Larry Seltzer (Feb 20)
- RE: Things you can't take pictures of in public Gary Funck (Feb 20)
- Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public Dude VanWinkle (Feb 20)
- Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 20)
- Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public Dude VanWinkle (Feb 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public Larry/Spamhaus (Feb 20)
- Re: Things you can't take pictures of in public Dude VanWinkle (Feb 21)
- RE: Things you can't take pictures of in public Bruce Ediger (Feb 21)
- RE: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" Larry Seltzer (Feb 20)
- Re: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" Blue Boar (Feb 20)
- Re: When surveillance cameras lie Dude VanWinkle (Feb 20)
- RE: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why shouldyou worry about it?" Larry Seltzer (Feb 20)
- RE: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" Gary Funck (Feb 21)
- Re: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" coderman (Feb 21)
- RE: "if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?" James Kehl (Feb 22)
- "arms" dealer! Gadi Evron (Feb 22)
- Re: "arms" dealer! Julio Canto (Feb 22)