funsec mailing list archives
RE: Administrator Accounts
From: "Todd Towles" <toddtowles () brookshires com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:46:52 -0600
I disagree. I think the Mac goes one better, and includes specific support for this, complains at you when you violate it, and makes you do a bit of hunting even to turn the root account on for actual use. *nix makes it easy at the command-line, with sudo, etc... but I can't recall there being good GUI support. I.e. I log in as luser, and will the various X bits do the auto-prompting like the Mac? To be completely fair, I spend very little time in a GUI on unix, so I probably wouldn't know. I have Windows (and a little Mac, lately) for GUIs. :)
Well not going to fight with you on that...since I am no a Mac user (yet), but I know Fedora works pretty close. But root is enabled and I do understand that OS X has root disabled from the start... As little as I know about the Mac security model..it sounds very good. Now if they can come to grips with the idea of future threats and be willing to talk about security issues more openly. ;) -Todd _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- RE: Administrator Accounts, (continued)
- RE: Administrator Accounts Todd Towles (Feb 22)
- RE: Administrator Accounts Nick FitzGerald (Feb 22)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 22)
- RE: Administrator Accounts Larry Seltzer (Feb 23)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Dude VanWinkle (Feb 23)
- RE: Administrator Accounts Nick FitzGerald (Feb 22)
- Re: Administrator Accounts David Lodge (Feb 23)
- RE: Administrator Accounts Todd Towles (Feb 22)
- RE: Administrator Accounts Larry Seltzer (Feb 22)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Brian Loe (Feb 22)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Blue Boar (Feb 22)