funsec mailing list archives
RE: Administrator Accounts
From: "Larry Seltzer" <larry () larryseltzer com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:32:04 -0500
If it doesn't "run in user mode" WTF was it ever get approved for use in the business?
Because in a monopoly environment, the choices are "take it" and "leave it". And if "leave it" isn't an option, it gets approved for use, no matter how ugly it is...
I think "it" in this case is the application, not Windows (which I would argue is not really a monopoly either, but that's another provocative thread). The application is probably not a monopoly, but some large internal program that writes a hell of a lot of data to the app's Program Files directory or to values in the HKLM hive, and that's why it requires admin access. Larry Seltzer eWEEK.com Security Center Editor http://security.eweek.com/ http://blog.ziffdavis.com/seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larryseltzer () ziffdavis com _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Administrator Accounts, (continued)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Blue Boar (Feb 22)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Mike Owen (Feb 22)
- RE: Administrator Accounts Larry Seltzer (Feb 22)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Matthew Murphy (Feb 22)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 22)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Mike Owen (Feb 22)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Blue Boar (Feb 22)
- RE: Administrator Accounts Larry Seltzer (Feb 22)
- RE: Administrator Accounts Nick FitzGerald (Feb 22)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 22)
- RE: Administrator Accounts Larry Seltzer (Feb 23)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Dude VanWinkle (Feb 23)
- RE: Administrator Accounts Larry Seltzer (Feb 22)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Brian Loe (Feb 22)
- Re: Administrator Accounts Blue Boar (Feb 22)