funsec mailing list archives
Re: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 13 Mar 2006 14:45:46 +0000
drsollyp () drsolly com (Drsolly) writes:
I looked at getting back to Pascal, but the main issue on that, would be the huge amount of third-party libraries I can use in perl via CPAN. How does the USCD equivalent look?
well although i was talking about the p-code interpreter, which when last seen allowed languages other than Pascal to target for it, i think it's safe to say that a p-system runtime would have as few libraries available for it if shipped today as Java or C++ had when they were each first spat out upon an unsuspecting world. -- Paul Vixie _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Richard M. Smith (Mar 12)
- Re: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Florian Weimer (Mar 12)
- Re: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Paul Vixie (Mar 12)
- RE: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Richard M. Smith (Mar 12)
- RE: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Larry Seltzer (Mar 12)
- Re: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Drsolly (Mar 13)
- Re: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Paul Vixie (Mar 13)
- RE: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Richard M. Smith (Mar 12)
- Re: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- RE: Google, Python, and the future of AJAX applications Richard M. Smith (Mar 14)