funsec mailing list archives
Re: Chocolate for Geeks
From: Matt Sergeant <msergeant () messagelabs com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:09:58 -0500
On 13 Jan 2006, at 15:48, Blanchard_Michael () emc com wrote:
It sounds oh so tasty :-)I'm intrigued enough to scout for a jar though.... Anything that soundsthat awful, has to taste good :-)
Remember - this is the stuff they *wouldn't* put in the beer. The breweries actually pay Unilever to take the stuff away.
Matt. ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: will the real budweiser please stand up? [was: Australian beer? WHAT Australian beer?!], (continued)
- Re: will the real budweiser please stand up? [was: Australian beer? WHAT Australian beer?!] Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Jan 14)
- Re: will the real budweiser please stand up? [was: Australian beer? WHAT Australian beer?!] Stephen J. Smoogen (Jan 15)
- Re: Australian beer? WHAT Australian beer?! at least with Germany... [was: Chocolate for Geeks] H D Moore (Jan 14)
- Re: Australian beer? WHAT Australian beer?! at least with Germany... [was: Chocolate for Geeks] Nick FitzGerald (Jan 14)
- RE: Chocolate for Geeks Nick FitzGerald (Jan 14)
- Re: Chocolate for Geeks Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 13)
- Re: Chocolate for Geeks Nick FitzGerald (Jan 14)
- RE: Chocolate for Geeks Drsolly (Jan 13)
- RE: Chocolate for Geeks Nick FitzGerald (Jan 14)
- Re: Chocolate for Geeks Matt Sergeant (Jan 13)
- Re: Chocolate for Geeks David Lodge (Jan 14)