funsec mailing list archives
Mac Security
From: "Todd Towles" <toddtowles () brookshires com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:41:32 -0600
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4620548.stm Note - I am not a mac user. I think several issues were't included that perhaps should be talked about. Given OSX has moved into the UNIX security model, which is a very good thing IMHO, however that only deals with the OS directly. You can have a locked down FreeBSD box, but if you put a vulernable PHP app on top of it..you are toast. Attacking apps is the new trend, this is seen by all of us and pushed very well in the SANS Top 20. Many OSS programs are ported to Mac and most likely carry these security issues with them to that OS, so why do mac user get some mad when Bill asked them to think more about the security of there system.. It would seem that many of the people that "fight back for the mac" are all too concerned about the automatic worm threat, instead of the new app attacking trend and possible targeted attacks. It is only a matter of time before some OSS vuln helps people attack OSX...comments? -Todd _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Mac Security Todd Towles (Jan 18)
- RE: Mac Security Larry Seltzer (Jan 18)
- Re: Mac Security Blue Boar (Jan 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Mac Security Todd Towles (Jan 18)
- RE: Mac Security Larry Seltzer (Jan 18)
- RE: Mac Security Todd Towles (Jan 18)
- Re: Mac Security Dude VanWinkle (Jan 18)
- Re[2]: Mac Security Pierre Vandevenne (Jan 18)
- Re: Re[2]: Mac Security Dude VanWinkle (Jan 18)
- RE: Mac Security David Harley (Jan 19)
- Re: Mac Security Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 19)
- Re: Mac Security Dude VanWinkle (Jan 18)