Re: [privacy] Verizon Won't Give Government 'Unfettered' RecordAccess

["StyleWar" <stylewar () cox net>]

weak diversion...  answer the question as posed.  I'm not talking about
reporters that get nabbed by Syrians Ferg... Your words were:

"...and is becoming alrmingly more possible in this country, anyone who
speaks out against the establishment/power-base is a target."

In THIS country Ferg.  Stay on your own topic.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergie [mailto:fergdawg () netzero net] 
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 8:49 PM
> To: stylewar () cox net
> Cc: privacy () whitestar linuxbox org
> Subject: RE: [privacy] Verizon Won't Give Government 
> 'Unfettered' RecordAccess
>
> For multiple examples, visit:
>
>  http://www.rsf.org/
>
> Being locked away for speaking your mind is a criminal endeavor.
>
> If you think that is a joking matter, you should seriously 
> reconsider your position.
>
> Cheers,
>
> - ferg
>
>
>
> -- "StyleWar" <stylewar () cox net> wrote:
> A target for what?  Stimulating debate? A vicious Midol 
> marketing campaign?
> Is there a long list of liberal journalists interned at 
> Guantanamo just PLEADING that someone will remember that 
> Dubya put 'em there for speaking their minds? Does anyone on 
> this list even have an unjustly accused 4th cousin there?
>
> sheesh...
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Fergie [mailto:fergdawg () netzero net]
> > Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 2:53 PM
> > To: knobdy () gmail com
> > Cc: privacy () whitestar linuxbox org; Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
> > Subject: Re: [privacy] Verizon Won't Give Government 'Unfettered' 
> > RecordAccess
> >
> > Bogus argument.
> >
> > In many places around the world, and is becoming alrmingly more 
> > possible in this country, anyone who speaks out against the 
> > establishment/power-base is a target.
> >
> >
> > - ferg
> >
> >
> > -- "Brian Loe" <knobdy () gmail com> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/15/06, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
> > > And the distinction is what, exactly?  Remember that the NSA 
> > > definition of "analyzing in bulk" is "tracking *all* the
> > connections"....
> > > If anything, that's even worse.  Tracking *me* because of some 
> > > specific incident is bad enough.  Tracking me and 4,000
> > people who are
> > > within 3-degrees-of-connected with me is a whole nother
> > kettle of fish...
> >
> > Trending, monitoring, probably other terms my simpleton 
> vocabulary can 
> > not think of right now...not tracking. To "track" you 
> they'd have to 
> > be looking at YOU. Why would they be doing that? This is black 
> > helicopter, tinfoil hat BS! Get over yourselves, you're not that 
> > important to anyone.
> >
> > I am NOT saying that if you have nothing to hide you have 
> nothing to 
> > fear - eventually, everyone has something to hide.
> > However, this is not the sky falling. Its not even new news.
>
>
> --
> "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
>  Engineering Architecture for the Internet
>  fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net
>  ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


_______________________________________________
privacy mailing list
privacy () whitestar linuxbox org
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy