Re: FW: Windows Live and Privacy

[Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>]

Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah wrote:
> To be boringly pedantic about it, doesn't the DMCA only kick in when you do 
> something to "circumvent" a tech that is being used for dig. rights man.?  (Which 
> is a dangerous enough law to have around ...)

You'd have to ask a lawyer, who would probably waffle because of the 
lack of case law.  But yes, it appears that the DMCA only introduced 
penalties for (section 1201) bypass of copy protection and (section 
1202) removal of copyright notice/watermark/broadcast bit(? I can't tell 
what "copyright management information" is.)  Penalties in section 1204:
http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA/hr2281_dmca_law_19981020_pl105-304.html

Note that I believe one video signal cleanup device was declared illegal 
under the DMCA, because it accidentally removed some of the Macrovision 
noise on VHS tapes.

I believe the DMCA was the start of criminal penalties for copyright. 
Later, general copyright violations got criminal penalties here: (I think)
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002319----000-.html

                                        BB
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.