funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] AT&T 'Spy Room' Documents Unsealed
From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:34:12 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- "Matthew Murphy" <mattmurphy () kc rr com> wrote:
What I think Gadi means is that it's entirely reasonable for a surveillance infrastructure to exist, as AT&T would require one to comply with the law (CALEA, et al). Therefore, the mere existence of a surveillance infrastructure (purpose unclarified) at AT&T does not necessarily mean that *illegal* or *extra-judicial* surveillance was taking place. It does seem at first glance that the documents originally "leaked" by Wired are, at best, soft on evidence that the surveillance equipment deployed is for illegal purposes. The government should not be hiding behind state secrets and neither should AT&T, but ironically, the fact that they are is why we cannot discount the possibility of entirely legal action on AT&T's part. I'm not holding my breath, but the possibility is nonetheless real.
I would agree, however, I'd qualify my agreement to a certain degree in the terms of "legality" -- if the NARUS infrastrcuture was installed simply to comply with impending CALEA requirements, then I would have to say it's just all peachy, sunshine, and above-board (well. maybe not sunshine). I do hope that the facts will become clear at some point, that shows whether AT&T was specifically complicit (or not) in providing customer records to the U.S. Government without a lawful court order (or NSL, or FISA order, or otherwise). There's a fine line here in simply comply with a lawful order and selling out your customer's call data. $.02, - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.1 (Build 1012) wj8DBQFGcDigq1pz9mNUZTMRAv2ZAKDNJ20XasI8C+ZrHImrby7VMKuN0QCg3FTd vami6rS/OphROqzqIa0pmB4= =HIzP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- [privacy] AT&T 'Spy Room' Documents Unsealed Richard M. Smith (Jun 13)
- Re: [privacy] AT&T 'Spy Room' Documents Unsealed ge (Jun 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [privacy] AT&T 'Spy Room' Documents Unsealed Fergie (Jun 13)
- Re: [privacy] AT&T 'Spy Room' Documents Unsealed Matthew Murphy (Jun 13)
- Re: [privacy] AT&T 'Spy Room' Documents Unsealed Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 13)
- Re: [privacy] AT&T 'Spy Room' Documents Unsealed ge (Jun 13)
- Re: [privacy] AT&T 'Spy Room' Documents Unsealed Matthew Murphy (Jun 13)
- Re: [privacy] AT&T 'Spy Room' Documents Unsealed Fergie (Jun 13)
- Re: [privacy] AT&T 'Spy Room' Documents Unsealed Fergie (Jun 13)