funsec mailing list archives
Re: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security
From: Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 23:24:01 +0100 (BST)
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, C Q wrote:
Mythbusters are not a British show. It's actually an American show... Take a look at their bios... It's just for Europe the Discovery Channel modifies the shows and uses a British voice over guy, so the European folks feel more comfortable.
No, it's so that we don't need subtitles to understand those impenetrable accents that some of you have. I watched the entire first half of "French Connection" without understanding a single word. Often when Susan watches a US show, she has the subtitles on. I would too, but I don't know how to work a TV, they have the most appalling user interface.
On 7/7/07, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:Mythbusters is a cool British show that tries to scientifically attack myths. They even use guns. :P To be honest, the way they conduct experiments and reach conclusions is somewhat flawed, to say the least, but they are cool, serious and professional (aside for the occasional safety boo-boo). They invest time and resources in building monstrosities to prove points. :) This time, it was about breaking biometric systems with Gummy bears! (see bottom of post for references) I really like this video, which you can watch on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXyFmieZjiE I have seen this over at Xavier Ashe's The Lazy Genius (http://blog.xavier.ashe.com/blog/_archives/2006/10/2/2381055.html) a longg time ago, but just made a search to find it again and post it here. In the past, I have studied biometrics extensively and how the systems can be beat. But there is nothing like a short video to make your point for you. Original link is from: http://blogs.technet.com/steriley/archive/2006/09/20/457845.aspx The original public paper discussing this particular technique of $10 worth materials for breaking these systems using Gummy bears is from Tsutomu Matsumoto, a Japanese cryptographer, from around 2002. I don't think his paper was ever online, but his slides were. They seem gone now at a casual search, but I found some other slides by him: http://web.mit.edu/6.857/OldStuff/Fall03/ref/gummy-slides.pdf Gadi. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security, (continued)
- Re: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security C Q (Jul 07)
- RE: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security Larry Seltzer (Jul 07)
- Re: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security Kurt Grutzmacher (Jul 07)
- Re: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security kitsune (Jul 07)
- Re: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security C Q (Jul 07)
- Re: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security Dr. Neal Krawetz (Jul 07)
- Re: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security Andy Cunningham (Jul 07)
- R: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security Cornali Remo (Jul 08)
- Re: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security der Mouse (Jul 09)
- RE: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security Larry Seltzer (Jul 07)
- Re: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security C Q (Jul 07)
- Re: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security Gadi Evron (Jul 07)
- Re: Mythbusters beat biometric finger print security C Q (Jul 07)