funsec mailing list archives
Re: ICANN SSAC Report on Fast Flux Hosting and DNS
From: coderman <coderman () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:14:28 -0800
On Jan 30, 2008 2:18 PM, Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> wrote:
... I guess it would be a bad idea to block traffic based on the ttl and expiry of records with less than x seconds then..
particularly sites using DynDNS+BigIP (or equivalent) for redundancy, load distribution, or fail over capabilities. high and low TTL are useful in many circumstances; don't throw the baby out with the bath water! best regards, _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- ICANN SSAC Report on Fast Flux Hosting and DNS Paul Ferguson (Jan 30)
- Re: ICANN SSAC Report on Fast Flux Hosting and DNS Gadi Evron (Jan 30)
- Re: ICANN SSAC Report on Fast Flux Hosting and DNS Dude VanWinkle (Jan 30)
- Re: ICANN SSAC Report on Fast Flux Hosting and DNS Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 30)
- Re: ICANN SSAC Report on Fast Flux Hosting and DNS John Payne (Jan 30)
- Re: ICANN SSAC Report on Fast Flux Hosting and DNS Dude VanWinkle (Jan 30)
- Re: ICANN SSAC Report on Fast Flux Hosting and DNS coderman (Jan 30)
- Re: ICANN SSAC Report on Fast Flux Hosting and DNS Dude VanWinkle (Jan 30)
- Re: ICANN SSAC Report on Fast Flux Hosting and DNS Gadi Evron (Jan 30)