funsec mailing list archives
Re: heuristics are dead?
From: "Larry Seltzer" <larry () larryseltzer com>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:12:33 -0500
If they're dead then what's the point of going on? Good bye cruel mailing list. Larry Seltzer eWEEK.com Security Center Editor http://security.eweek.com/ http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larry.seltzer () ziffdavisenterprise com From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Alex Eckelberry Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 6:55 PM To: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: [funsec] heuristics are dead? At the 17:45 mark, a group of security experts decries heuristics and behavioral detection, saying they are "dead". http://www.demosondemand.com/dod_security/events/topics/av.asp No, they're not. I posted a response on my blog http://tinyurl.com/c5xx3e Alex
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- heuristics are dead? Alex Eckelberry (Mar 01)
- Re: heuristics are dead? Larry Seltzer (Mar 01)
- Re: heuristics are dead? Nick FitzGerald (Mar 01)
- Re: heuristics are dead? David Harley (Mar 02)
- Re: heuristics are dead? Amrit Williams (Mar 04)
- Re: heuristics are dead? David Harley (Mar 02)
- Re: heuristics are dead? Alex Eckelberry (Mar 02)
- Re: heuristics are dead? David Harley (Mar 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: heuristics are dead? Aryeh Goretsky (home) (Mar 05)