funsec mailing list archives

Re: cyber-9/11


From: "Paul M. Moriarty" <pmm () igtc com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:05:40 -0700

Blow up peering points?

Wait, I got it:  Rent 100's of backhoes across the country.  Dig in.

- Paul -


On Apr 7, 2009, at 1:59 PM, Larry Seltzer wrote:

From the just-introduced Rockefeller-Snowe bill (U.S. Senate S.773) 
(http://www.infracritical.com/papers/cybersec4.pdf 
):

2(10) According to the National Journal, Mike McConnell, the former  
Director of National Intelligence, told President Bush in May 2007  
that if the 9/11 attackers had chosen computers instead of airplanes  
as their weapons and had waged a massive assault on a U.S. bank, the  
economic consequences would have been ‘‘an order of magnitude  
greater’’ than those cased by the physical attack on the World Trade  
Center. Mike McConnell has subsequently referred to cybersecurity as  
the ‘‘soft underbelly of this country.’’

I read this and I have to ask, basically, WTF does this mean? On top  
of it not being within the capabilities of Al Qaeda to do such a  
thing, I have to wonder what they could really have done.

Larry Seltzer
eWEEK.com Security Center Editor
http://security.eweek.com/
http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/
Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
larry.seltzer () ziffdavisenterprise com

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: