Re: Ghosts of steganography past

[RandallM <randallm () fidmail com>]

> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:06:42 -0500 (EST)
> From: der Mouse <mouse () Rodents-Montreal ORG>
> Subject: Re: [funsec] Ghosts of steganography past
> To: funsec () linuxbox org
> Message-ID: <200912101909.OAA15674 () Sparkle Rodents-Montreal ORG>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> > > I want to know if people are still using primitive methods of hiding
> > > information
> http://s169.photobucket.com/albums/u210/noodles-1991/?action=view&current=1159390191021.jpg&newest=1
> > (Go ahead - *try* to claim that's not really primitive stego. ;)
>
> I sure don't see any hidden message in it.  What am I missing?
>
> Or is it just so effective it's defeated my attempts to find it?
>
> /~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
> \ / Ribbon Campaign
>  X  Against HTML                mouse () rodents-montreal org
> / \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
>
>
> ------------------------------
This is one of those motivational posters. Stenography - FAILED

Cant you all see that? Sheesh.

-- 
been great, thanks
a.k.a System

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.