funsec mailing list archives
Re: Facebook Image Privacy
From: Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:26:44 -0800
Dan Kaminsky wrote:
Larry was _specifically_ stating "maybe security through obscurity works after all". That is _specifically_ an argument regarding operating systems and other designed systems.
Where? Here's what I have from Larry in this thread: "A Facebook employee entered a comment that said that only the user who posted the image gets that URL from them, so therefore it’s private..." "I’ve often thought that security through obscurity gets a bad rap. Perhaps this is one of those cases. My real problem with it is that I’ve marked it for “Only Me.” Why do they need to provide this link? And they only do it for images, not for plain text posts or videos where you mark it as “Only Me.”" "My nipples explode with delight!" BB _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy, (continued)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Larry Seltzer (Jan 17)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Dan Kaminsky (Jan 17)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Vaughn, Randal L. (Jan 17)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Alex Eckelberry (Jan 17)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Blue Boar (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Dan Kaminsky (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Blue Boar (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Dan Kaminsky (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Blue Boar (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Dan Kaminsky (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Blue Boar (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Dan Kaminsky (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Blue Boar (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Larry Seltzer (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 19)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Dan Kaminsky (Jan 19)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy der Mouse (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Imri Goldberg (Jan 17)