funsec mailing list archives
Re: Facebook Image Privacy
From: Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:42:36 -0800
Dan Kaminsky wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com> wrote:Dan Kaminsky wrote:Larry was _specifically_ stating "maybe security through obscurity works after all". That is _specifically_ an argument regarding operating systems and other designed systems.Where? Here's what I have from Larry in this thread: "A Facebook employee entered a comment that said that only the user who posted the image gets that URL from them, so therefore it’s private..." "I’ve often thought that security through obscurity gets a bad rap. Perhaps this is one of those cases.And what are the other cases in which security through obscurity gets a bad rap? Is there somewhere we actually disagree?
Yes... in URLs! That's the whole thread! BB _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy, (continued)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Vaughn, Randal L. (Jan 17)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Alex Eckelberry (Jan 17)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Blue Boar (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Dan Kaminsky (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Blue Boar (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Dan Kaminsky (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Blue Boar (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Dan Kaminsky (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Blue Boar (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Dan Kaminsky (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Blue Boar (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Larry Seltzer (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 19)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Dan Kaminsky (Jan 19)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy der Mouse (Jan 18)
- Re: Facebook Image Privacy Imri Goldberg (Jan 17)