Re: no poison for Joplin

[Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]

On Tue, 31 May 2011 18:10:40 +0300, Gadi Evron said:
> I can see your point if we discuss it philosophically, however, these 
> things have clinical definitions. A spammer may be a regular human being 
> such as you or I, with very similar psychology.

Highly unlikely.  Doing things (like spamming) just because you want to even
when society disapproves is pretty much the *definition* of sociopath. Sure,
there may be spammers who really hate themselves and are only doing it because
they have to pay for their child's kidney transplant, but I think it's safe to
exclude both of them from the analysis. The rest of them are sociopaths
who like the money and don't care what society thinks.

Attachment: _bin
Description:

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.