Re: no poison for Joplin

[Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 01:33:07PM -0500, Ned Fleming wrote:
> I could see Rich K starting a home for destitute (but reformed!)
> spammers. Well . . . maybe not.

<chuckle> Given that I'm on the record as advocating the death penalty
for spamming, this seems somewhat unlikely.

But it's kind of a moot point: there are NO reformed spammers. (Oh, there
are plenty who claim to be so, but closer examination inevitably reveals
that they've merely been on hiatus and/or shifted tactics.  The canonical
example of this is Sanford Wallace.)

---rsk
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.