nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Basic BGP configuration problem"
From: Henry Kilmer <hank () rem com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 20:57:11 -0400 (EDT)
Mark Borchers writes:
We are working on adjusting our multihoming policies such that multihoming with Sprint will be a viable solution for customers.Excellent news. Is it official? Would you be willing to furnish any further details at this time?
As pointed out on this list, multihoming with Sprint has two main difficulties. The first issues is that Sprint's aggregation blocks specifics from its CIDR block from going out untouched, even for BGP customers, and the second is the fallback does not work properly since Sprint does not listen to any announcements of our CIDR blocks from peers. Both of these are being addressed and are nearing completion. A more verbose description will be sent when we are actually done (and get some sleep). -Hank - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: "Basic BGP configuration problem", (continued)
- Re: "Basic BGP configuration problem" Henry Kilmer (Oct 01)
- Re: "Basic BGP configuration problem" Perry E. Metzger (Oct 01)
- Re: "Basic BGP configuration problem" Dorian R. Kim (Oct 01)
- Re: "Basic BGP configuration problem" Michael Dillon (Oct 01)
- Re: "Basic BGP configuration problem" Joseph Malcolm (Oct 03)
- Re: "Basic BGP configuration problem" Michael Dillon (Oct 03)
- Re: "Basic BGP configuration problem" David Carmean (Oct 03)
- Re: "Basic BGP configuration problem" Henry Kilmer (Oct 01)
- Re: "Basic BGP configuration problem" Henry Kilmer (Oct 01)