nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGPs in use
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry () Mlink NET>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 14:24:23 -0400 (EDT)
instead of descending into a silly syntax discussion of whether ibgp is an egp or an igp, perhaps the guy would like an answer to his question. most large nsps use is-is, but usually only to carry the routes of the bgp speaking interfaces.
Really?? Not that I desire to express any prejudices, but I honestly thought nobody used it. Does it just work better for very large networks? -Phil
Current thread:
- IGPs in use Andre' Zehl (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Timothy R. McKee (Oct 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IGPs in use Megatron (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Chrisy Luke (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Randy Bush (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use David O'Leary (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Phillip Vandry (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Jared Mauch (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Alex Bligh (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Tony Li (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Chrisy Luke (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Ben Black (Oct 12)
- Re: IGPs in use Chrisy Luke (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use Paul G. Donner (Oct 13)
- BGP as an IGP (Was Re: IGPs in use) Chrisy Luke (Oct 13)
- RE: IGPs in use Thom Youngblood (Oct 13)
- Re: IGPs in use bmanning (Oct 12)